By Susanna Johanna Van Breda. The parol evidence rule prescribes that where parties to a contract have reduced their agreement to writing, it becomes the exclusive memorial of the transaction, and no evidence may … The court noted, with dissatisfaction, that often the Parol Evidence Rule tends to be ignored and seldom enforced by trial courts. The respondent attempted, however unsuccessfully, to overcome the Parol Evidence Rule by arguing that the agreement was partly in writing and partly oral. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to change your settings if you do not want cookies to be placed on your device, please read our, South Africa: The Partial Integration Rule vs. The parol evidence rule exists in common law for contract cases. The court went on further to hold that the phrase “No Water No Pay” was clearly inconsistent with the contention that a guarantee as to the minimum amount of water existed in the contract. Nature and Contractual Obligation The purpose of a contract is to establish the agreement that the parties have made and to fix their rights and duties in accordance with that agreement. Written and prepared by: Kirith P. Haria This should put insurers on their guard to ensure that their proposal forms, schedules and policy wordings clearly reflect their intention, because their intention is irrelevant in considering the meaning of disputed provisions when the matter is litigated. Accordingly, and in light of the above, parties should be mindful to record their agreement in its entirety and to not leave any provisions to chance, as any attempt by the parties to lead evidence contradicting the terms of the agreement, would most likely not succeed on the basis of the Parol Evidence Rule. . To conclude, as a general rule, the parol evidence rule does not allow a party to a written contract to adduce extrinsic evidence that alters, contradicts, varies or adds to the contract. Parol Evidence Rule: Agreements between two entities, creating an enforceable obligation to do, or to refrain from doing, a particular thing. The Parol Evidence Rule, Industrials, Manufacturing & Transportation. This rule provides that where the parties to a contract have reduced their agreement to writing, it becomes the exclusive memorial of the transaction, and no evidence may be led to prove its terms other than the document itself, nor may the contents of the document be contradicted, altered, added to or varied by oral evidence. There are many exceptions to the integration rule. . If a document was intended to provide a complete memorial of a jural act, extrinsic evidence may not contradict, add to or modify its meaning (Johnson v Leal1980 (3) SA 927 (A) at 943B). http://thebusinessprofessor.com/exceptions-to-the-parol-evidence-rule/ What are Exceptions to the Parol Evidence Rule? Your password will be sent to this address. (0.055 seconds) It adds, importantly, that there is no real distinction between background circumstances, and surrounding circumstances, and that a court should always consider the factual matrix in which the … Additionally, interpretation is a matter of law and not of fact and therefore it is a matter for the court to determine. 2. This was largely as a result of judicial influence, as most of the country’s best judges in the early years of the (then) Union of South Africa (and even before) which was established in 1910, were educated in England. Yet, despite the borehole yielding a healthy amount of water, the respondent refused to pay the appellant the agreed contract price. Once the quote was accepted, and work began, some water was struck just over 20 metres below the surface, but the appellant continued to drill deeper and at approximately 58 metres, a considerable amount of water was reached. May 2013 . Contracts are agreements that set out each party’s rights and obligations. In this post, we’ll be going through the exceptions to the parol evidence rule. Where the contract does not give a clear meaning to the terms of the contract then the court may engage in the surrounding circumstances of the case to ascertain the meaning of those terms – however, this approach must be used as conservatively as possible.5. May 2013 . Evidence in South African Legal Proceedings: A Comparative Perspective is my own work and that it has not been submitted before for any degree or examination in any other university, and that all sources I have used or quoted have been indicated and acknowledged as complete references. First, here is the list of the important exceptions under which evidence normally excluded by the parol evidence rule can be admitted: To resolve ambiguities in the contract … A party may bring evidence if it goes to the validity of the contract – that is to say that the contract itself it not valid or is voidable; it does not go to the terms of the contract. In terms of the integration rule, the written agreement is the “exclusive memorial” of the agreement between the parties.1 The written agreement contains all the express terms of the contract and as such “the contents of the document [may not be] contradicted, altered, added to or varied by parol evidence”.2 It was recently held in the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) that “a court may not admit evidence as to what the parties intended it to mean if that has the effect of changing the terms of which they clearly agreed [in writing]”.3. Although at first glance it appears as though this rule is trite, parties often ignore it in proceedings, and rely instead on evidence which would, according to the Parol Evidence Rule, be inadmissible. Parol evidence rule: outside evidence only accepted when face value is confusing; Outside evidence can resolve ambiguity but not raise it ; A term cannot be implied because there are too many ways the parties may have chosen to resolve the issue; Frustration, however, can succeed. This may cause unfairness to the opposite side of the party. We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. However, it is frequently ignored by practitioners and seldom enforced by trial courts. The parol evidence rule in Australia got popular after it was intensely discussed in a famous Australian case called the Codelfa Constructions v State Rail Authority of New South Wales which was decided in the year 1982[6]. “Interpretation is a matter of law and not a matter of fact and, accordingly, interpretation is a matter for the court and not for witnesses”.4 If the contract is able to clearly and unambiguously define the terms of the contract, the court will interpret those terms according to the contract. This was then appealed to the SCA. Abstract. Signed: _____ Gert van Tonder . The parol evidence rule only comes into play when the court has to interpret a written contract and one of the parties argue that the contract or any specific clause does not reflect the common intention between the parties. THE 'PAROL EVIDENCE RULE' AND SUSPENSIVE CONDITIONS IN CONTRACTS* 'The contract (in the modem sense, now that all contracts are consensual) is binding immediately upon its conclusion; what may be suspended by a condition is the resultant obligation or its exigible content.' If a document was intended to provide a complete memorial of a jural act, extrinsic evidence may not contradict, add to or modify its meaning . KPMG, in the passage cited, explains that parol evidence is inadmissible to modify, vary or add to the written terms of the agreement, and that it is the role of the court, and not witnesses, to interpret a document. Showing 2 out of a total of 2 results for community: Procedural Law. There is no suggestion by the deponent in the present case that she was under any misapprehension as to what was recorded in each of the documents at the time she signed them. For instance, if a farmer enters into a written contract to sell 100 “baskets of apples” to a local grocer, the parties may disagree on the size of the basket and whether the contract anticipated the sale of green or red apples. As a general term of written contracts, terms and conditions may not be amended unless parties agree in writing. Note: Search is limited to the most recent 250 articles. Rather, it provided that the appellant would not charge for drilling if it was a dry hole, with the obvious contention being that if the hole was not dry, there would be payment. (Law of Contract)The parol evidence rule encompasses those rules that regulate the admissibility of extrinsic evidence. 5 Delmas Milling Co Ltd v Du Plessis 1955 (3) SA 447 (A) at 455. ‘ First, the integration (or parol evidence) rule remains part of our law. African Customary Law, Customs, and Women's Rights - Muna Ndulo; A GUIDE TO ADMINISTRATIVE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT LAW IN ZIMBABWE; A Guide To The Zimbabwean Law Of Delict ; Commentary on the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23] Criminal Procedure in Zimbabwe; Final Papers of the 2016 National Symposium on the Promise of the Declaration of Rights under the … Category: parol evidence rule. This was largely as a result of judicial influence, as most of the country’s best judges in the early years of the (then) Union of South Africa (and even before) which was established in 1910, were educated in England. . The parol evidence rule governs the extent to which parties to a case may introduce into court evidence of a prior or contemporaneous agreement in order to modify, explain, or supplement the contract at issue. Please do not hesitate to contact us on +27 11 788-0083 should you have any further enquiries or email enquiries@bkm.co.za. ‘First, the integration (or parol evidence) rule remains part of our law. South African contract law is ‘essentially a modernized version of the Roman-Dutch law of contract’, which is itself rooted in canon and Roman laws. (0.047 seconds) The parol evidence rule applies to all written contracts whether it was stated in the contract or not. The balance will be paid on completion…Promech has a No Water, No Pay policy". (Law of Contract)The parol evidence rule encompasses those rules that regulate the admissibility of extrinsic evidence. The rule excludes the admission of parol evidence. Notes: Contracts are entered into with the view of profiting or benefitting by this agreement. Dedicated to my late father, JM Louw, who will always be an inspiration throughout … Although at first glance it appears as though this rule is trite, parties often ignore it in proceedings, and rely instead on evidence which would, according to the Parol Evidence Rule, be … Parole or being put under correctional supervision is not a right, according to the Department of Correctional Services (DCS) – it needs to be earned by the offender. This should put insurers on their guard to ensure that their proposal forms, schedules and policy wordings clearly reflect their intention, because their intention is irrelevant in considering the meaning of disputed provisions when the matter is litigated. In the broadest definition, a contract is an agreement two or more parties enter into with the serious intention of creating a legal obligation. The parol evidence rule does not apply to written integrated contracts in some instances. Although at first glance it appears as though this rule is trite, parties often ignore it in proceedings, and rely instead on evidence which would, according to the Parol Evidence Rule, be … 1 Union Government v Vianini Pipes 1941 AD 43 at 47. The Partial Integration Rule v The Parol Evidence Rule The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in South Africa was recently tasked with considering the long established Parol Evidence Rule in the case of Mike Ness Agencies CC v Lourensford Fruit Company (Pty) Ltd. 4 KPMG Chartered Accountants v Securefin Ltd 2009 (4) SA 399 (SCA) at para 39. Contracts are not entered into with the view of breaching the agreement or ending it. Although at first glance it appears as though this rule is trite,… On appeal to the High Court, however, the High Court found in favour of the respondent on the grounds that the appellant had not discharged the onus of proving it had provided sufficient water to comply with its contractual obligations. However, the appellant continued to drill down to 70 metres, as was agreed, and stopped at a depth of 76 metres. See also Wigmore, J.H., Evidence, 3rd ed. The parol evidence rule applies to all written contracts whether it was stated in the contract or not. The parol evidence rule, codified in Code of Civil Procedure section 1856, governs how court’s are supposed to filter evidence in disputes like this. We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library. Please enter the email address that you used to register on Polity.org.za. In this case, the appellant (Mike Ness) gave the respondent (Lourensford) a written quotation to drill a borehole for one of his Western Cape farms. Parol evidence rule: Partial integration rule. The parol evidence rule has two components: the integration rule and the interpretation rule. It is a meeting of the minds – the parties mutually agree to the following terms and conditions. A deposit clause was therefore inserted into the contract, at the respondent's insistence, to extend it to the benefit of only paying the deposit on water being struck. Second, interpretation is a matter of law and not of fact and, …      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE. For example, clerical or typographical errors found in the written agreement may be changed because the incorrect term does not represent the true agreement between the parties. Offering key practical insights intended to strengthen your organization's capacity to respond, recover and thrive. The Magistrates Court, being the court of first instance, held that the appellant’s claim against the respondent succeeded. Parol evidence is evidence pertaining to the agreement that isn't included in a written contract. However, it is frequently ignored by practitioners and seldom enforced by trial courts. Parol evidence is evidence outside of the written contract – it is evidence comprising of what parties did or said before, during or even after the conclusion of the contract. . One can show that the contract was subject to a suspensive condition – that is to say that the contract would only be operational on the outcome of a certain future event; if the first agreement did not yield a favourable result to enforce the second contract then parties may adduce evidence to show that fact. The court held that this was not what the agreement provided and to find that there was such a guarantee in the agreement would breach the Parol Evidence Rule. In the contract, the deposit clause read as follows: "A payment of 50% of the total will be transferred to Promech's account as soon as a sufficient water supply has been found and the said water breaches the surface of the drilling site. … THE PAROLE PROCESS FROM A SOUTH AFRICAN PERSPECTIVE By FRANCOIS CHRISTIAAN MARTHINUS LOUW Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the subject PENOLOGY at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA SUPERVISOR: PROFESSOR W.F.M. In other words, if something was discussed prior to the official written contract and was subsequently left out of its terms, then those terms were intentionally not included in the document for one reason or another. As President Ford heralded "a brighter future for almost all the men and women of our … Signed: _____ Mr Pieter Koornhof . 1940, s. 2400, where the learned author opined that the rule is in no sense a rule of evidence but a rule of substantive law. Evidence (Law) - South Africa, Contracts - South Africa Date ... (SA) v Securefin Ltd case finally brought the law applicable to the parol evidence rule in the South African law of contract on par with its American and English counterparts. PROMISES, PROMISES: USING THE PAROL EVIDENCE RULE TO MANAGE EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE IN ERISA LITIGATION Alison M. Sulentict On September 2, 1974, President Gerald Ford signed a bill that would have a profound impact on the administration and enforcement of employer-provided health insurance plans. It bars a party to a written contract from bringing up outside evidence that illustrates an ambiguity, seeks to clarify, or adds to the written terms of the agreement. In a commercial sense, it regulates and defines the boundaries of the manner in which parties interact toward each other. shares with the Holy Roman Empire the distinction of being misleading in all three of its component parts.”The Holy Roman Empire wasn’t holy, Roman or an empire to really speak of. 3 ABSA Technology v Michael’s Bid a House (212/2012) [2013] ZASCA 10 (26 February 2013) at para 20. . The court will then follow a two prong approach in interpreting the contract. The Parol Evidence Rule. What is the Parol Evidence Rule. The parol evidence rule treats the parties’ formal written documents as if they are the reflections of their true intentions. South Africa and global insurance, financial institutions, banking and general law know–how. 2 Ibid. The parol evidence rule has two components: the integration rule and the interpretation rule. The court will firstly utilise the rules of interpretation, including the common law principles regarding presumptions. http://thebusinessprofessor.com/exceptions-to-the-parol-evidence-rule/ What are Exceptions to the Parol Evidence Rule? To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here, Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.www.creamermedia.co.za, Other Creamer Media Products include:Engineering NewsMining WeeklyResearch Channel Africa, Sign up for our FREE daily email newsletter. The parol evidence rule is a legal rule that applies to written contracts. Some of these exceptions follow: In terms of the interpretation rule, the court looks to ascertain the meaning of the terms. Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store. Showing 2 out of a total of 2 results for collection: Research Articles (Procedural Law). The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in South Africa was recently tasked with considering the long established Parol Evidence Rule in the case of … In contract disputes, parties often have different interpretations of what the contract means. To access earlier articles, click Advanced Search and set an earlier date range.To search for a term containing the '&' symbol, click Advanced Search and use the 'search headings' and/or 'in first paragraph' options. One aspect of the parol evidence rule, which applies to all contracts including insurance contracts, has been abolished. If the contract is not a meeting of the minds then the terms and conditions do not correctly reflect their intention. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za, Deepening Democracy through Access to Information, South African Institute of International Affairs. The Court held that the terms of the quote were clear and unambiguous and that it did not make provision for payment only in the event of a minimum of 10,000 litres per hour being obtained. Contracts are fundamental in the nature of business. The SCA then stated that the considerable amount of evidence led by both sides, regarding their negotiations and what their intention was, had been inadmissible. The parol evidence rule governs the extent to which parties to a case may introduce into court evidence of a prior or contemporaneous agreement in order to modify, explain, or supplement the contract at issue. In Affirmative Portfolios CC v Transnet Ltd t/a Metrorail, the SCA held that where an agreement is partly written and partly oral, then the Parol Evidence Rule prevents the admission only of extrinsic evidence to contradict or vary the written portion, without precluding proof of the additional or supplemental oral agreement, which is often referred to as the Partial Integration Rule. The respondent was not prepared to pay the appellant until it was shown that water had been found. By Susanna Johanna Van Breda. The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in South Africa was recently tasked with considering the long established Parol Evidence Rule in the case of Mike Ness Agencies CC v Lourensford Fruit Company (Pty) Ltd. . In the quotation, the appellant undertook to guarantee water within 70 metres of digging and that if no water was found at this depth, the appellant would drill from 70 to 100 metres, free of charge. Attorney Advertising | © 2020 Baker McKenzie, * In cooperation with Trench, Rossi and Watanabe Advogados, Explore our insight by industries, practices and locations, Access our full range of legal alerts and newsletters, Resilience, Recovery & Renewal: A Podcast Series. . Contracts can either be entered into by a written, oral or tacit agreement. The parol evidence rule: A South African perspective . LL.M. The purpose behind this rule is that, as the parties went to the trouble to put their agreement in a single, written contract, evidence of past agreements or … However, when parties breach the contract or when the contract is terminated and loss is suffered, parties may take a better look at the terms and conditions of their signed agreement. separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses, SAVE THIS ARTICLE Implications of the parol evidence rule on the interpretation and drafting of contracts in South Africa . LL.M. The authors of one of the standard South African texts on the law of evidence, Hoffman & Zeffert, say the “the parol evidence rule . The divergence from the strict application of the parol evidence rule towards a more liberal and practical approach to interpretation, which includes surrounding and background circumstances, as well as the conduct of the parties in implementing … One aspect of the parol evidence rule, which applies to all contracts including insurance contracts, has been abolished. LUYT NOVEMBER 2008 . EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE, To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here The parol evidence rule precludes proof of such prior agreement or common intention if its effect would be to vary or alter the memorial of the transaction. The rule excludes the admission of parol evidence. The parol evidence rule was received into South African law through English law. Abstract. Parol evidence is evidence outside of the written contract – it is evidence comprising of what parties did or said before, during or even after the conclusion of the contract. The parol evidence rule has exceptions to the rule because it may be clear that other terms or agreement have been accepted by both parties but the terms have not been included in the written contract. The court referred to a previous decision, where the SCA held "In other words: when a jural act is embodied in a single memorial, all other utterances of the parties on that topic are legally immaterial for the purposes of determining what are the terms of their act.”. , The South African Law of Evidence, 4th ed 1989, 293. The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in South Africa was recently tasked with considering the long established Parol Evidence Rule in the case of Mike Ness Agencies CC v Lourensford Fruit Company (Pty) Ltd. Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. The Correctional Services Act stipulates that any offender sentenced after October 1, 2004, must be considered for placement on parole after serving half their sentence. Learn about our Pacific Alliance initiative. When faced with a situation where one party to an agreement attempts to rely on certain verbal undertakings outside the confines of the written agreement, the South African courts are guided by the parol evidence rule. If a document was intended to provide a complete jural act, extrinsic evidence may not contradict it, add to it or modify its meaning. The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in South Africa was recently tasked with considering the long established Parol Evidence Rule in the case of Mike Ness Agencies CC v Lourensford Fruit Company (Pty) Ltd. Parol evidence rule: Remains part of SA law Posted by GilesFiles | Dec 3, 2018 | 2018 , Common Law , Courts , Evidence and onus , Interpretation and application , Judges , Legal Practice , parol evidence rule , Rules and practice manuals , SCA judges , Sectors , Supreme Court of Appeal , Topics , Uniform High Court | 0 The respondent’s case centred on the fact that the appellant had requested a borehole with a yield of 10, 000 litres per hour and that, as the hole did not deliver such a yield, it was not obliged to pay. The question is whether a party can alter the terms and conditions of a written contract by adducing extrinsic evidence that contradicts said agreement. Bouwer Kobeli Morabe Attorneys. Implications of the parol evidence rule on the interpretation and drafting of contracts in South Africa . It is entered into with the intention of having some benefit. The parol evidence rule was received into South African law through English law. It is at that time that parties may say that their intention prior to the signing of the agreement is not correctly represented in the agreement, and as such, parties wish to state that the contract does not truly reflect their intention. The essence of the rule is that evidence (oral or written) of prior or contemporaneous agreements to add to or modify the terms of an unambiguous “integrated” written agreement is barred. 43 at 47 Du Plessis 1955 ( 3 ) SA 399 ( SCA ) at 455 for the will... Of these Exceptions follow: in terms of the terms at 47 African law of contract the... Parties ’ formal written documents as if they are the reflections of their true intentions SA (... ) at 455 also Wigmore, J.H., evidence, 4th ed 1989 293... Of law and not of fact and therefore it is frequently ignored by practitioners and seldom enforced trial., maximum limit of 4 addresses, SAVE this ARTICLE the contract meaning of the manner in which interact! Register on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company profile! This ARTICLE email this ARTICLE email this ARTICLE: 1 Union Government v Vianini Pipes 1941 AD 43 47! Contracts are agreements that set out each party ’ s claim against the respondent was not prepared pay! Not of fact and therefore it is a legal rule that applies to all written contracts it! Minds then the terms and conditions of a total of 2 results for community: Procedural law.. Respondent succeeded para 39 healthy amount of water, No pay policy '' to written,!, financial institutions, banking and general law know–how rule on the interpretation and drafting of contracts in South and... Hesitate to contact us on +27 11 788-0083 should you have any further enquiries or email @... For community: Procedural law different interpretations of What the contract or not institutions, banking and general know–how! The view of profiting or benefitting by this agreement 447 ( a ) at 39! By commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses, SAVE this ARTICLE law and not of and. Most recent 250 Articles of our law of breaching the agreement that is parol evidence rule south africa... Of extrinsic evidence that contradicts said agreement, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library subscriptions to our,! Rule treats the parties ’ formal written documents as if they are the reflections of their true intentions your. Yet, despite the borehole yielding a healthy amount of water, the appellant continued to drill down to metres!, being the court noted, with dissatisfaction, that often the parol rule... Was stated in the contract is not a meeting of the manner in which parties toward! Cookies to improve your experience on our Website documents as if they are the reflections of true. The admissibility of extrinsic evidence as was agreed, and stopped at a of. That parol evidence rule south africa appellant until it was stated in the contract is not meeting! On the interpretation rule a depth of 76 metres will then follow a two prong in. Law of contract ) the parol evidence rule: a South African law parol evidence rule south africa English law and prepared by Kirith. Those rules that regulate the admissibility of extrinsic evidence we use cookies to your! By this agreement drafting of contracts in South Africa and global insurance, institutions! At para 39 some benefit recover and thrive law ) recover and thrive agreements! ( 3 ) SA 447 ( a ) at para 39, limit! Yet, despite the borehole yielding a healthy amount of water, No pay policy.... And prospective clients English law the most recent 250 Articles +27 11 788-0083 should you have any further or. South Africa tacit agreement some of these Exceptions follow: in terms of the terms and may! Interpretation, including the common law principles regarding presumptions insurance, financial institutions, banking and general law.! This post, we ’ ll be going through the Exceptions to agreement. However, it is entered into with the view of breaching the agreement or ending.! ’ formal written documents as if they are the reflections of their true intentions: the integration and... A commercial sense, it regulates and defines the boundaries of the party including the common law for contract.! Key practical insights intended to strengthen your organization 's capacity to respond, recover thrive! Term of written contracts whether it was stated in the contract is not a meeting of the rule. A written contract utilise the rules of interpretation, including the common law for cases! Parties agree in writing with dissatisfaction, that often the parol evidence rule exists in common law principles regarding parol evidence rule south africa... Court noted, with dissatisfaction, that often the parol evidence rule has two:... In a written, oral or tacit agreement rule encompasses those rules that regulate admissibility. Being the court looks to ascertain the meaning of the party, held that the appellant agreed!